was thinking same and there are only two reasons I can come up with...
1. there could be some hidden costs to those liabilities for rehabilitation - this is unlikely as IGO don't want to attract such news which will be damaging to their brand but I still, in theory it is there.
2. IGO does not believe the ground holds Tier 1 gold deposit so they passed it MM8. - this is most likely scenario.
Considering ALK are very conservative they would have checked the first point - I hope.
can't think of anything else.
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report, page-267
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ALK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
52.5¢ |
Change
-0.020(3.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $317.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 54.0¢ | 55.0¢ | 52.5¢ | $518.0K | 968.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 140725 | 52.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0¢ | 67758 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ALK (ASX) Chart |