Putting aside the Daily Mail's credibility,
IE:
The Daily Mail tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wordings such as “Woman, 63, ‘becomes PREGNANT in the mouth’ with baby squid after eating calamari”, which is a misleading headline. In 2017, Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail as an ‘unreliable’ source. When it comes to sourcing information, they use minimal hyperlinked sourcing and sourcing to themselves. Further, a Reuters Institute survey found that 26% of respondents trust their news coverage and 47% do not, ranking them #11 in trust of the major UK news providers. In general, most stories favor the right; however, the Daily Mail will report either side of the story is sensational enough.
How would the Cannon-Brookes new venture affect or effect upon us any influence ?
Good News & Bad News, page-45238
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,458 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.27 |
Change
0.110(3.48%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.846B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.22 | $3.30 | $3.21 | $93.46M | 28.68M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 29000 | $3.26 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.27 | 20000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |