This does not make sense
When and why would RT give up security ? RT would be crazy to do so and have many such dealings so are not novices.
It was conditional on issue and listed as such in every quarterly
VA does not wipe out security
Even if NUH didn't do their obligation and security was not registered it is still contractually bound to do so. RT do have a leg to stand on
It is a significant and notifiable so ASX announcement should have been made either on failure or removal of security
CN has never been linked to performance in regards to other dealings
CN is a debt instrument and will rank in VA
I know a X in a box may look promising but I suspect it is being misunderstood.
As for enough $. means enough for VA and probably from R & D rebate assuming a company in VA who may have other government payments overdue is able to receive it ?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NUH
- Ann: Appointment of Voluntary Administrators
Ann: Appointment of Voluntary Administrators, page-268
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 146 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NUH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
8.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $21.91M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
NUH (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable