I have not followed closely - but the case that Reynolds is pursuing hinges on :
1. The pressure she was put under by all and sundry after the Higgins incident went public?
And
2. That this pressure is completely attributable to Higgins FB posts?
Even though Reynolds was 'born to be defence minister' and obviously her performance as minister was exemplary....
(Born to be defence minister - a more specific case of being born to rule).
Reynolds v. Higgins, page-102
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)