@gridder - not sure why I can't seem to reply to your thread but can only tag you instead.
I think we have discussed this before and I don't think anyone could find/establish whether the 3D that was shot over WE included the ED1 compartment. One would think so but can't be certain.
With SE, I remember now - it was the unusually low salinity water at SE2/3 which threw the log data way off. Basically, if they applied the SE2/3 data over SE1, SE1 would be filled entirely with water and no gas. We did encounter low salinity water at WE4, suspected to be sourced from a perched water lens. Given the water production from WE4 declined from 50b/mmscf to 37b/mmscf over 46hr test window, the source of that water is clearly not of a large volume or it wouldn't have declined that much over such a short window. So the chance of having similar issue with misinterpreted log data at ED1 is extremely low IMO.
618
STX Price at posting:
19.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)