Why does NXT trade at 26 times the very rubbery contracted EBITDA, of circa $400M, whereas Airtrunk just transacted at 21 times?
From the AFR
the AirTrunk deal is understood to have been struck on a multiple of 21 times run-rate earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), a slightly rubbery number that takes in the commitments AirTrunk has secured from customers for the next few years.
NXT still looks expensive to me..
What's in the News, page-1655
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NXT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$17.63 |
Change
0.210(1.21%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.58B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $17.49 | $17.63 | $17.36 | $60.98M | 3.477M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1272 | $17.53 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $17.63 | 10060 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NXT (ASX) Chart |