ok, so now that your negative inference that the teck deal was doubtful has been discretited you raise a different one; that teck will go slow. And the basis for this, new, negative suggestion is what exactly?
Meerkat, the first of your posts clearly suggested Rox MUST have teck on board. Now you suggest that when Teck come on board it will be of no benefit. Make your mind up.
You have previously, quite rudely, told us all to "get it" Perhaps if you took your own advice you might find some peace cease what could be construed as deliberately constructed provocative and mischievous baiting. Do you really own this stock?
time for reflection i think, page-37
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RXL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
16.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $65.15M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 16.0¢ | 16.0¢ | 16.0¢ | $1.328K | 8.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 127712 | 15.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0¢ | 102281 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.06am 15/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RXL (ASX) Chart |