What evidence/information/facts do you have to support the consistent comments that you have made that the Buy Back was timed to allow a major shareholder to exit?
Why would you not want the company to pay the lowest amount possible for the Buy Back shares? They are spending our money.
Even if as you suggest they could/should have paid more for the Buy Back shares why would it make any difference to the SP today?
You refer to CPS being involved in the Buy Back, my understanding the decisions on the Buy Back process did not involve CPS. Do you have any evidence/information/facts to the contrary?
Banter and General Comments .. BRK, page-12054
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $52.50M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $54.72K | 5.394M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 2945757 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 46141279 | 36 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRK (ASX) Chart |