Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Another attempt to kill Trump!, page-751

First 751 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
spinefx

10,667 Posts.

1069

19/09/24

12:41

Post #: 75744423
Share

Originally posted by hersuit ↑

Back on the woke sub...you didnt see the issue and that its been coed since 2019

This is the first one that has been designed for purpose

Now my point is....that the military, by doing this, ignored the downside of coed subs and the myriad problems that could and would ensue by mixing the sexes for extended periods in high-pressure underwater ops

No question there is a huge potential downside and hence a risk of some measure to efficiency and hence downgrade to military capacity
Let's agree that is about as true a statement as can ever be made

So going from there...tell me how the last 100 years of submariner work has been shown to be lacking efficiency because of it being solely male? And how by co-eding the thing...it improves the efficiency of the fighting force?

Im betting that the answer tow both are a resounding NO - there was no such problem and no resultant gain in efficiency from having a mixed fleet underwater

So if, on the one hand, we have no demonstrable need...and on the other an irrefutable risk to efficiency....why do it?

The only reason is efficiency is no longer the HIGHEST priority

Its being woke.

Expand

H,

Female officers have been going to sea in submarines since 2011.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

GDM

Great Divide 'rapidly evolving' into commercial miner with first Challenger pour

ASX Market Close: Pretty boring day, but we're back in the 8,600s

ASX Market Open: Can we squeeze one more record reset into Week 29? | July 18

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

Unemployment expectations correctly called today's 4.3% rate

First 751 Last