The (non existant)WMD's were the pretext for that war. Many did believe that to be true. My default position is that wars are started on lies, if the pretext turns out to be true, well you get that sometimes, but it turns out much better in the main than believing anything a government says regarding a war.Is anyone suggesting a Nuremburg style war crimes trial for Bush, Cheney, Rice etc followed by a nice hanging as per Nazis for similar crimes ie. "waging a war of aggression"? No, because winners make the rules as well as write the history afterwards.
"What lies are you suggesting that i an purchasing.Lets go thru them."
i don't know what you believe, other than a few comments in support of killing "terrorists",whatever that means, so why don't you tell me what you believe to be true then I will have something to respond to.My question was regarding your support for killing terrorists when someone else is defining what a terrorist is. Some american congressmen have called for Assanges killing on "terrorist" grounds.Do you support that? Is that what you mean by terrorist? A label that gets pinned on someone for whatever reason?
