Ann: Investor Webinar, page-37

The idea for a shareholder Webinar was initiated by a shareholder and supported by other shareholders communicating on another platform.

It was put directly to Neil- and what do you know?- a day later we get an announcement about a shareholder webinar in 2 weeks.
The 2 week period between now, and then, is for him and Greg to get as much info together so that they're prepared as best as possible, whilst in parallel- attending to the various tasks already scheduled in his calendar (Perth presso etc) as well as now having to scramble and deal with a whole bunch of concerned shareholder enquiries (and rightly so- he has made himself readily and very quickly available to me, and everyone else I've been in communication with recently- probably a combined shareholding of circa 30million shares- real skin in the game- and that's not saying a shareholding of 1000 shares doesn't matter- any holding matters - but a larger holding probably has more financial significance especially when that holding is deeply red given the near 60% drop on the 8th).


Could Neil improve in areas?
Abso fkin- lutely.
Like all of us can.


Yet you commented earlier in this thread:
"A webinar 2 weeks after getting kicked in the balls.. clearly they don't feel accountable to shareholders for their failings"

I realise your posts- like mine, have zero net impact on the share price - However, it would be great if we didn't have to endure your constant, continued negativity which (to me at least) smacks patently of complete ignorance of the effort and tasks required of a leader in a junior, immature gas explorer, nor the actual nature or incredible extent of risk associated with what we've been doing both in Mongolia and Grandis.

Every EXR shareholder is entitled to a whine and a whinge every now and then- but as a default setting it's pretty boring to endure.

I- like everyone, have the option of course to just put you on Ignore- but I hope you might actually contribute something we can all benefit from?