Reduced holdings in CHM and IMU significantly over the past months since JC's departure as same board, same decisions, same outcome?
Switched a bit to RAD as now Lantheus and the CEO have taken over from Hopper although the sp isn't reflecting it at all - maybe Hopper has to officially to step down first.
Anyway, it is not the money, it's about how recklessly he is allowed to operate and to jeopardise the development of the 3 platforms we all might need one day. And what we see here can happen at IMU too, does anyone would like to see that?
But as everyone here is happy about the current status the question must be asked, why isn't every listed company going for getting suspended due to insufficient funds? Why is everyone else focused on profits when CHM holders applaud the huge risk of getting bankrupt?
But you are right, it is about numbers. If Steini says 2+2=4 but everyone else says no, it is 5, then Steini must be wrong and 2+2=5.
Time will tell if the Hopper-way is the correct way, the board doing an exceptional job and this suspension is a blessing. Apart of me, everyone here is convinced, "YES".
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
