why throw in an argument that has no substance in fact to support a view. there is zero evidence to suggest that they would kill each other to get on ships there is zero evidence to suggest that the numbers would multiply dramatically
Here we go, throwing the 'evidence' line now. There is hordes of evidence to show that people in less fortunate circumstances will do anything to find themselves and their families a better life. Just look at the policy change of the Labor government to see the change in boat arrivals. If a change like that could trigger such an increase,what do you think a policy of chauferring them to our door will do.
I can't believe you seriously think it wouldn't cause a huge attempted influx. Simply astonishing. And you failed to address the question I asked. If we start picking up people from one country, then what is your policy for those of other countries who start arriving at our doorstep by boat due to the open arms policy?
nobody can dispute using the evidence that policy over the last 10-20 years has failed and is still failing. a different approach is required not more of the same
Yes many people will dispute this. The evidence suggests that Howard's policy was successful in discouraging people from risking their lives to get to Auatralia in rickety boats.
Fair enought to suggest ideas, but frankly your idea of picking people up from Indonesia by boat is ridiculous.
