Ann: Long Term Suspended Entities, page-12

interesting question Cred for a skeptic, however paying $2,000,000 for 60% stake suggests you should get your return on your investment in about 3 to 5 years, if they did their due diligence correctly, if so then that suggest OneStep was profitable and I would argue more so profitable today suggesting businesses are using OneStep hence the growth is at play. Ci1 has full control of mattes moving forward of OneStep and to MY delight and perhaps many other investors this news of increased REGISTERED MEMBERS suggests that businesses have now option available at their own pleasure to which imo many do use.

Remember I mentioned to you QFE very similar operation to “OneStep" last week ? SP was 0.095 and today it’s at 0.135 suggest there’s plenty of interest by investors in this field. So what’s the difference between the 2 companies imo for one QFE marketing I think is better than Ci1 but Ci1 has domination over QFE with its other subsidiaries potentially all could be intertwined suggesting OneStep has a bigger advantage. Wait till we are back on the market a gut feeling that OneStep has some serious weapons and ready to go imo the foundation is very solid ready to build compounded registered members potentially going global.

not professional DYOR