As usual some posters need to educate themselves on the timeline , reality and reread documents. It isn't a hard concept to review triggers and what management were up to.
When companies do agreements etc it often states in what jurisdiction process any disputes are to happen in. Shareholders are not aware of such fine detail.
Considering the time NUH appear to have been notified this $ was in dispute and shareholders awareness of change of product and its timeline it may appear obvious that there may have been issues in regards to auditors on valuation of existing stock of components and if in fact they were considered to be NUH property on accounts etc
Bottom line is orders were issues against NUH in ( who chose not to defend / attend so a default ruling) and NUH would have been aware they were not defending action at a date???
What were management doing with their time around that date- well company announcements show us at least part of it and seemingly producing reports wasn't top of their list? Tidying up and moving deckchairs possibly was happening? Consultants and advisors were getting paid and advising ofn protecting themselves etc and ticking boxes for smooth transition to "friendly" VA ?
As usual I know nothing and always just guessing and not implying there was any wrongdoing to ASX or ASIC standards ...........................
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?