Is silence misconduct, page-116

Davisite review of the data

AGM 2018 address - https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2995-02049844-2A1118755
my question is, were the results as brilliant as claimed?

They made some big statements. "The trial was successful perhaps even more than anticipated and certainly to the point of indicating that eradication of HIV is actually possible". "BIT225 benefits HIV patients above and beyond current anti-retroviral treatments"

At the same time you get the directors flogging shares.

Lux- you used a fairly strong word today! I think a more palatable way of discussing things is simply asking the question, has the science been overstated? This is an allegation which has been raised when the company listed, 20 odd years ago.

https://www.copyright link/companies/a-storm-in-a-petri-dish-20030731-ka8mt

The regulators sided with the company then. But the question remains live. Last AGM they said, we've had 9 out of 9 successful trials. Is this open for debate?

people say @Davisite had an agenda, but he gives some interesting interpretations of the data. Interesting, how subjective this stuff can be. You thought it would be fairly objective.