are climate change deniers naturally gullible?, page-45

WangChung,

All the examples you gave are anecdotal - that's not science. EG I could just as easily mention a particularly hot day and say that proves AGW.

What I mean by nothing will convince you (in the general sense) is that the Deniers will always find an out (I'd call it a cheat) You can't just look at the data and argue that - it becomes no no the instruments are dodgy - no no the scientists are trying to scam us

That's what I mean- whatever the evidence the Deniers will always find a way out

I've seen charts posted here with clear uptrend but all the Deniers can do is bang on about the outlier year 1998 (and then say that it shows its cooling)

BB and others can post charts and data and scientific arguments until he's blue in the face, can't he ? It doesn't matter. There is no data that could ever convince you is there ??