are climate change deniers naturally gullible?, page-131

I omitted the reference to radiation from fly ash from the last post.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste

Scientific American may be an untrustworthy source for some in the antiscience denialist cabal but I like it. This particular article is a balanced presentation imo, pointing out that most fly ash isn't particularly radioactive just that nuclear safety protocols have reduced safety risk to the order of one in a billion.

Anna Bligh has indicated support for at least examining nuclear power for Oz. We are a country where nuclear power could provide all our baseload power needs.