I'm not sure was your reply for my post, where I asked you about MU-1 and Pattern 1. I don't think, that was a bait question. Whole Wyoming use alkaline ISR (UEC, URG) but Peninsula had low efficient results. So they switch to acid and stated, that it works better at their project. You stated, that pipes will be clogging because of gypsum. PEN stated, that this is not a problem because of low carbonates (less than 1-2%).
MU-1a low PH was working and pumping (or is still working) for a year. They didn't mention any clogging.
Can you enlighten me why their process have flaws?
Here is a Lance project ISR process in 3D:
https://youtu.be/2XUcDmMnx-8?si=Ux666bF1-nyTcDMp
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PEN
- Remember Target ... $12.36
PEN
peninsula energy limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
62.0¢

Remember Target ... $12.36, page-174
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
62.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $98.97M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PEN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable