Ann: Capital Raising Update, page-447

We, at whatever level shareholding we have, should not be in this position.

None of us should be trying to second guess why Mr Scruffy has mismanaged this so badly, there should be no need for back channel discussions throughout the weekend and certainly there should be no need for anyone here to be trying to put a positive spin on what should be (is) such a positive technical point in 4DS development.

Mr Scruffy needs to take ownership, the group needs to urgently seek & secure an upgrade in perhaps even a semi capable leader (yes, there is potentially one vastly more capable amongst us, yet that is but one option), & Mr Scruffy thanked for his service... with a boot.

As to similarities to bake 3... well bake 3 was a failure, according to the clearly suboptimal testing utilised at the time.
Once a better multimeter was procured & test procedures improved, bake 3 was found to actually show performance, which led to an extremely successful bake 4.

That has zero parallel (imho) to Mr Scruffy's recent performance.

As said previously, unless he can demonstrate to each & every one of us that he has an aggressive hidden plan that swiftly reverses the recent value depreciation, he has to go.

So Mr Scruffy, what say you? To everyone here.