Once again in your blind denialist zeal, you fail to report the truth. Denialists have no need for evidence. Distortions and lies may be sufficient for you but I prefer science. When you suggest I provide "no evidence" you are being untruthful.
Wander back through this thread and you will see the evidence I presented.
147427
I do agree with a little of what you write "...history shows from the past."
Thank you for that insight.
"...well before any AGW came into play."
Is this a slip or are you beginning to acknowledge the reality of AGW?
"Not building on known flood plains!" is one sentiment I agree with but sifting truth from your lies is hardly worth the effort. For example you tip out the truth when you add "potential" to "rising sea levels".
There is nothing "potential" about rising sea levels pal but if you want to be canute about it, be prepared to get wet.
