abc now ..doco about fox news.. eom, page-43

Simple FF1

reading the 2 links it is pretty clear which of the 2 sticks to the actual facts of what happend and supports it with actual transcripts and evidence.

And which follows the facts with added distortions and interpretations

The actaul interview was over the guy whose father was killed in sep 11 signing an anti war ad.

In the interview (http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/transcripts/oreillyglick.htm) Orielly had no interest in letting Glick put his position forward and was interested in only attempting to abuse and ridicule the guy.

He then went on to lie ( on a number of occassions) adout what Glick actually said and did. Lies that were proven to have been told last night in the doco as well as in the link I posted.