Replying to
@Motors i thought the eml was very well put together and obviously shared a lot of the sentiment out there of te current shareholders
Its just a shame its not someone else making the challenge otherwise it would have got my vote
personally i would get rid of the lot of them but that is just not going to work
so i voted to keep Charmaine
Get rid og Garner this could be your only chance so take advantage of it i say
And i voted against the challengers
I spoke to Per and made it my preference would be to keep Charmaine on,
get rid of James Garner and get this new financial guy they have in the background to guide Charmaine where she has fallen down in the past
I believe with the correct market guidance Charmaine would be a great CEO unfortunately she has let us all down with excesive unwarrented dilution in the past and most certainly needs help on the capital market side of things as far as i am concerned anyway
they are my thoughts Motors
@arjay Correct
Also these people could not spark any interest @ market with the company awaiting results of a possible company changing Scenario
Zero interest infact exactly the opposite complete and utter trashing of the stock in a market sell off pre results.
So how will they go if all are re elected i think the challengers letter outlines just how well they have done thus far and it most cetrtainly has not been pretty, especially with the unwarrented dilution we have suffered through lack of ability at board level
(20min delay)