Capital would come from the same place where we currently get our capital from: equity markets.
If two separate entities had a higher combined market cap than a single combined entity then over the two there would be less total dilution to achieve the same outcome, not more.
Of course with the U enrichment tech at a different readiness level than the ZSS, one outcome would be that dilution would move in one direction over the other (i.e., if the ZSS entity was given a massive market cap and U was the stub, then the dilution on the U side would be greater, and vice versa).
If incumbent shareholders are enriched by a spinoff then accessing additional capital through a potential CR down the road becomes much easier.
The only good argument against this suggestion that I can think of are the investment banking fees that it would entail, which is a real cost. But given how hot QC is right now, I think that it is definitely something that should be at least shopped around.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLX
- Spinning off Zero Spin
SLX
silex systems limited
Add to My Watchlist
5.81%
!
$4.54

Spinning off Zero Spin, page-3
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$4.54 |
Change
-0.280(5.81%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.102B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.79 | $4.82 | $4.54 | $1.397M | 297.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
11 | 3424 | $4.54 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.55 | 2750 | 18 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 1448 | 4.550 |
11 | 5126 | 4.540 |
12 | 9700 | 4.530 |
8 | 6966 | 4.520 |
5 | 7583 | 4.510 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.560 | 2448 | 11 |
4.570 | 6703 | 34 |
4.580 | 5008 | 15 |
4.590 | 4956 | 16 |
4.600 | 4970 | 12 |
Last trade - 12.24pm 29/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |