However the net is hazadous when looking up stuff, probably more BS out there than data driven stats and this means it can be easy to be led astray especially from youtube channels so in my opinion it's best to think logically about what your looking up before you begin in order to get some idea of the points that matter and quality of any content you may watch.
With prostate cancer for example theres decades of proper data, results and medical procedure results thus one goes to these sources of info to make sure your making the right choice and more importantly to understand why the doctors recommend what they do. If one does this on prostate cancer then i think it would become clear that it's best to go to the quack and let them do what they do.
Whereas with diets there is no real proper data and if one thinks about it logically to get proper data on impacts of diets one needs to track multiple groups of people on different strictly maintained diets for decades and this is next to impossible to achieve thus i wouldn't bet ones life on diet people opinions if theres decades of data available like with prostate cancer.
The jab was different cause no one had any data so one had to wait for the data to get created and work from there.
