message to ect, page-8

At the moment even the most loyal holders are getting frustrated, starting to say something IMO.
For me the issues are management related, I get the feeling tincom are carrying on without keeping esi up to date, why would that be? Does tincom have issues dealing with esi?
Why would tincom deal with arup directly and not keep esi informed?
Esi shareholders as bbj said deserve much better, let us know exactly what is happening and then we can make a decision.
And... even though this has been mentioned many times, why haven't management got skin in the game, buy some shares to show they are excited about where we are heading (I'm sure there would have been plenty of opportunity in the last year).

And what is happening in china, why hasn't an mou eventuated? I don't know if it is because management think we are too big and other companies will only deal with us on our terms? We need to get the first deal completed, who cares if it isn't on the best terms for us, many more will flow, surely (IMO).

Our whole focus needs to be on keeping costs low, we don't need to go to all these conferences, we need to progress the first deal, then others will take note and we can spread the word.

IMO management have a lot to answer for, but there still getting paid good money while our investment depreciates.

At least with La Jolla on board we will know the outcome soon. There are so many excellent posters here who post on esi and have done thorough research, however even if the technology is excellent, is in the right space at the right time, if you don't have the right management it amounts to nothing.

I hope Kos can get us back on track.