traditional council areas, page-8

"no material role": they dont pay costs or fees

Everyone including Shapiro concede that they have 'advisory role'..whom do they advise ....the chief..and where is he now? So whom do they advise --the people I guess

Roka phasha did not have to be a respondent because they were not the holders of the rights challenged - they were a benefactory of the rights ownership of Genorah that had been awarded by DMR

High court found them to be the the administrators of Eerstegeluk - so the judgement did ascribe role to them

Concourt examines only documentary evidence - no witness examination or ground level investigation