Manmade Global Warming - New Extremes, page-10237 - HotCopper | ASX Share Prices, Stock Market & Share Trading Forum

Originally posted by jopo: ↑

"It follows a 'radiative process' because that's how physics works."

LOL, in your dreams! You seem to live in a purely radiative world, but our Earth does not operate that way, mate!
We just went through the embarrassment of you claiming that the atmosphere follows a radiative equilibrium—yet as soon as you add a touch of convective adjustments, as outlined in the Manabe and Kiehl papers (which you yourself recommended), suddenly your "radiative world" falls apart.
It is a FACT that our troposphere is convective. Are you disputing this?
Also, Venus's atmosphere does not follow a radiative feedback model. It operates under a convective/pressure-induced collisional de-excitation (CDE) mechanism. Radiative de-excitation (RDE) is not the dominant factor in Venus’s atmosphere.
You have a lot more learning to do, mate.

Expand

You continually mis represent what I say.

It's not me that has to learn, I'm representing what is found in every published text book on climate physics.
You are here claiming that all the text books have been wrong for the last 150 years but have not presented any publishable alternative that passes even the simplest examination.
You have nothing but a few words you string together in meaningless assertions, if you had anything as world changing as you claim you would at least be able to speak the language of a physicist and offer a logical mathematical justification.

Let's hear for a start how you calculate the increase in the effective temperature of a planet above the SB temperature including energy balance.
Nikolov couldn't do this, let's see what you have.

And you can stop with the condecending "mate".