Well, not sure what to say old mate. You are doubling down on the fallacy. Why does anyone bother with peer review, controls, blinding? Let's just trust the good professors!
Don't worry about his reputation; he'll get a grant, keep his lab funded for another few months, and just move on to the next thing if results are inconclusive. There are zero reputational risks. I'm not alleging fraud from Recce. Just some questionable practices. Such as lack of peer review. Yes, it does take months. But Recce has been running for 8+ YEARS. And not a single peer reviewed anything.
Yes, some efficacy was demonstrated, apparently. But how does that compare to standard care? What percentage were cured? After how long? How severe was baseline? What else were the participants taking? Why didn't they include an active control?
RCE Price at posting:
40.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)