Ok let's show people using your own posts just now how little you know given you asked for it. >
You allege I can't understand a graph suggesting a corelation between carbon dioxide levels and alleged temperature change in regard to climate. >
I have previously pointed out that the rise of females in the workforce % wise is just as well corelated for the same time period - so which one MUST BE THE CAUSE? As you want to claim correlation equals causation to the ignorant? Maybe we should run a 3 way Anova to sort out co dependency if any? Lost you yet? Go look it up.
You also want the ignorant to believe that climate is only a few decades rather than thousands of years. In particular you want them to believe this for only the cherry-picked decades you think you have a case, and you want them to ignore the rest of history that makes a laughing stock of your claim.
The term is Ice Age rather than Ice decades which you want people to think is 'long term'. You have no idea about climate but have been conned.
And you still have not addressed the content of the video.
