But if that conversation can’t include disagreement without accusation, then we’ll keep going in circles.Let’s keep it honest. Let’s keep it respectful. And above all, let’s keep it based on what’s written.
You regard disagreements with your interpretation of scripture as accusations.
You regard honesty as a weakness when it flies in the face of your certainty.
You want respect to be shown to you, which in reality is always agreeing with you while showing no respect yourself. You show no respect for those who disagree wth you
You want to keep it based on what is written. In reality, based on your interpretation of what is written and on your assumption that everything is contained in what is written.
In summary, "conversation" with you is not possible.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- The Misunderstanding
The Misunderstanding, page-93
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
PAR
PARADIGM BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED..
Paul Rennie, MD & Founder
Paul Rennie
MD & Founder
SPONSORED BY The Market Online