There's no way in the world that FAR would be signing an agreement that contained a 'termination for convenience' clause. Investment of this magnitude (drilling) requires certainty, and such a clause deprives them of that certainly. No company would put money into a venture if that clause were present. The agreement will be watertight because both parties need it to be.
-Disco
imagine, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
50.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $46.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 50.0¢ | 50.0¢ | 50.0¢ | $2.305K | 4.609K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17688 | 50.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 50.5¢ | 88712 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |