As a sceptic I'm not surprised. As an AGW sceptic also, I would hope some warming alarmists read this and ponder the possibility that their pet theory has similar problems.
I know this sounds applicable: Even when a claim is disproved, it hangs around like a deadbeat renter you can't evict. Years after the claim that vitamin E prevents heart disease had been overturned, half the scientific papers mentioning it cast it as true, Ioannidis found in 2007.
