I have no problem understanding what you are saying, and I largely agree with you.
As I have said on other threads on this forum, it appears the management are sitting back waiting for circumstances to break their way without being proactive in seeking a resolution.
For example, it was reported by another poster (admittedly with an axe to grind) that ETM management did not attend a recent US-sponsored meeting of miners in Greenland.
Why not? To me, this is inexcusable because I presume the meeting, besides being attended by mining interests from the U.S., would also have been closely monitored by the new Greenland Government. Wasn't this a lost opportunity for ETM to present its case in a public forum and press for a resolution?
Were ETM not invited?
Are they so out of the loop that they didn't know about it in time to attend?
However, it was also mentioned that some companies participated online. Did ETM manage to participate this way?
These are questions that need answering by management to give shareholders some confidence that they still know what they doing.
ETM Price at posting:
4.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)