currently with the independant environmentalists now , the last sia was in 2020 but with a new update in 2025 during the summer, there is also a new geology report out while critical have announced much additional work.
I think what you are trying to say is that we are correct and you were not in defending that the SIA and the EIA was inadequate from as far back as 2012 . Also all the environmentalists had a strong case in announcing the Greenland that both of these applications were grossly inadequate and needed updating . it also suggests that during this time no finance was obtained and therefore nobody was interested in pursuing this . I can only assume the company was in financial crisis unable to conduct these works themselves and now the new buyer has had to do them because they have discovered that they are inadequate for the purposes of the operation .
why has everyone found them so inadequate you think. You did keep promising that they were top quality and we can see here that they were inadequate and everybody was right. Are you going to apologise to everyone about that
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
