wow what a lot of slander
1) strike length about 7 km
2) no problem with the shares
3) overall grade is about 10 times that of etm
4)the ore body is 300 meters thick from the surface so where does the 300 millimetres come from
5) eudialyte is proven to be much easier to treat
6)no uranium problem on license ,just check out latest publish reports. to get holes of over 300 m thickness with only background uranium should be proof enough even for you
7) full public approvals
8)i dont see any problems with treating such ore
9)no pollution as can sell the waste go read the publications
10) actually correct me if i am not wrong tanbreez has an exploitation license etm has to now at best redo the whole thing meaning etm is many years behind ,tanbreez has now spent approx $55m on the project so it has been very sucessful at raising money and is in the field now spending ,how long is it since etm last drilled was it 2011
11) it was etm that in their reports complained they had a silica gel problem it is proven that today eudialyte has not
12) no chemicals in greenland ,less acid than etm in the chem plant and no alkaline needed go read the literature
now i gather the recent meetings etc have been a disaster for the etm company but that is no reason to make up stories on the success of next door ,on a story that has been extremely open.Iis it not time now to concentrate on etm and its major problems like not having an approved eim , dorfmanite etc . the question is also are the rumours true the company is trying to sell this project
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
