I'm genuinely keen to see your evidence.
So far, I’ve noticed your replies are mostly assertions, not demonstrated proof. You’ve made several strong claims, but haven’t really addressed some of the major issues people are raising with the globe model. I’m not here to argue for the sake of it — I just believe it’s fair to ask honest questions and expect solid answers.
Maybe you could help clear up a few of these?
If Earth orbits the sun, then six months later we should be 300 million kilometres on the other side — yet we see the same constellations, same stars, like the Southern Cross, in the same place every night. Shouldn’t the sky look completely different?
NASA openly admits that their Earth photos are composites or CGI — not live, full, unedited shots. In fact, they even say "it has to be photoshopped." Why?
Earth is supposedly spinning at 1,670 km/h, orbiting the sun at 107,000 km/h, and the entire solar system is moving through space at over 828,000 km/h — yet we can take perfectly still time-lapse shots of stars over hours. No blur. No shift. No parallax.
The horizon always rises to eye level — even from a plane or high-altitude balloon. It never drops away as it should if we were standing on a ball.
Again, I’m not pushing a belief — I’m asking sincere questions. If the globe model is solid, these should be easy to explain, right?
So I’m keen to hear your side — with real-world examples or tests that can be replicated, not just classroom theory.
