Compelling though some of your arguments and graphs are, few of them that could arouse the curiosity of someone like me have sources attached, which is a pity. One that did (above), I investigated and found to have been debunked:
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/cherry-picked-antarctic-ice-data-does-not-disprove-climate-change-2025-02-11/It seems that climate skeptics misrepresent facts too; you and others posting unsubstantiated "facts" here and calling others childish names does nothing for your credibility.Thanks for the video. I watched it all the way through as the urbanisation effect on global temperature measurement is something that has bothered me for a while. Whilst his argument against accepting "that graph" is plausible I didn't hear anything that would otherwise explain the melting of arctic ice or melting of glaciers; this seems to be undisputed. As above, the canned laughter dubbed in when Brian Cox held it up does nothing to enhance Tom Nelson's credibility; he probably thought none of his audience would know anything about Q&A (let's be honest, most of then wouldn't know where Australia is).
Recent NASA data below confirms Nelson's assertion that warming is greater in the Northern Hemisphere, but he omits to mention that it is most pronounced in the remote Arctic, not around population centres. Maybe Nelson could be a bit more honest himself.
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/world-of-change/global-temperatures
