Ann: Placement to raise $1,000,000, page-29

Let’s be clear about one thing: comments here might cause some short-term noise and fluctuations around the stock’s perceived value, but they do not control the broader direction of the share price. If market moves were really that easy to control, we’d all be billionaires by now.
The suffocating situation we’re in today? It’s the result of OVT’s own management, one blunder at a time.
There was a brief glimmer of hope — the appointment of Keast. I suspect that’s when many trapped investors got lured in, believing real change was coming.
But when the share price started to climb on that momentum, Clay began dumping his stock en masse, cashing out and choking any chance the company had to build sustainable growth. The real short-seller of OVT? Clay himself. And the scam? It basically exposed itself at that point.
What followed was a circus of mismanagement. In an era where global teams run entire companies remotely, they fired Keast on the laughable grounds that he couldn’t be “100% based in the US.” Since then? Nothing but wheel-spinning. No real progress, just the illusion of activity.
Meanwhile, they kept pumping out vague, hollow announcements through a web of interconnected shell companies — enough to catch ASIC’s attention.
So what’s the likely conclusion here? Maybe BNPL was never the goal. Maybe the plan was always just to create volatility — good news here, bad news there — and milk the price swings for profit.