Share
12,595 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1659
clock Created with Sketch.
11/06/25
00:37
Share
Originally posted by tendoji
↑
in the first instance, it is AVZ’s job to assess. It’s an objective test on whether matters in question affect project progress or not.
I think it’s safe to say, that after the AVZ sent a letter of complaint to the Minister of Portfolio in September as I understand, but then by late November Jincheng is entered into the registry RCCM - and to be sure about the materiiality of this AVZ was writing very aggressive letter/s to Cominiere and Zijin not to do it prior to it happening means AVZ is facing the Q, of a might potentially affect project progress and Value is hard to talk down as not material except to do what they did on May 4 is dwell on the legal merit -/ which is only part of the test Question not the only.
Expand
Can you pop that though the translator and repost.
Also can you provide any proof of any claims you seem to keep trying to make and evidence you have lodged these complaints with asic/asx and the feds?