PNV - Banter and General Comments, page-13791

Your not making any sense

Polynovo has for years now been very clear on its one goal, growth, meaning expansion, revenue and market share.

This is achieved by taking the money they have or get from selling their product, and reinvesting this back into the business. This quicker this is done the better, as you lose efficiency if waiting. Because of this, PNV does not have a high level or growth in earnings, and only went positive last year to silence the people critiquing the company, and also legitimize the business slightly

You want them to show high growth in earnings.....but earnings are taxed. And they aren't paying a dividend so any earnings they would have would just be subject to tax then reinvested later rather than immediate reinvestment reducing taxable income. Theres literally zero benefit to an earnings growth strategy

Clearly the optimal strategy for Polynovo to maximize success would be to keep earnings suppressed while funneling all the money they can into expansion. But you somehow disagree and think that most optimal approach would be to substantially increase earnings and tax expenses for the company, while attempting to continue growing revenue

Im just struggling to understand how someone who spends hours here debating people, arguing for something that would provide no benefit to the company and only incur a cost. Even a basic level of understanding of the tax system makes it clear why a company focused in growing would place earnings at the very bottom of the priority list