again all environment questions have been answered. as for the heritage area which came later tanbreez gave away area so it could be included in the area again your lack of research is breath taking. tanbreez has consistently said no chemical plant in greenland.
again this is the same smoke screen you put up to avoid talking about the etm questions like why has the company not published its program of field work which for this year which should have been submitted to the MLSA by the 1st of may. surely as a public company something should have been set out for share holders
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
