Generic question - not worth it's own thread.
I wonder why one day
@shareman and
@TomAndJerry just stopped posting here. Both spent over a year here (different years though of course) every single day, posting hourly about BRN's so called issues and arguing with actual shareholders with a clear intent of attempting to convince mum n dads to sell their shares, neither never ever being able to prove themselves as being an owner of any shares then reporting posts when called out.
They were so dedicated to BRN but just disappeared.
Very odd that these usernames were so passionate about the demise of this company yet seemingly when tapped on the shoulder, they simply close off that username.
But miraculously, another one ALWAYS shows up as an overlap to the exiting one.
The history is all there to see.
S
urely any subsequent future versions of that username would only re-enter hot copper dialogue with the full knowledge that everyone here has seen the same terms, phrasing and intent, meaning their posting here again is pointless. Persuasive language and repetition is key for them.
I guess it's a good opportunity to determine if anyone here is acting against your interests as a shareholder, maybe through bombarding every thread with downramping commentary and / starting numerous threads to bait actual shareholders.
Every shareholder knows theres risk in buying shares. Everyone knows things are taking a while for the delayed gratification of SP rise to occur.
I simply don't see what benefit to anybody here, continued downramping of a stock could possibly be.
Also this post is relevant to the thread and is generic, anyone offended or feeling targeted should maybe consider time for a username change again again again.
Pointing this out apparently is being triggered.
(20min delay)