BUYER BEWARE, page-2

Wait.. do you still believe El Campo's title is not Enigma Strategic Mineral's possesion or do we forget about those assertions you made in the past and now believe you when you make these claims about ESM' ownership of DAM?

Also what are you actually showing here as proof? An email by someone with bad spelling and grammar sent in June?

You might want to re-read the previous announcement on the subject which they maintain regarding ownership of the entire Mojave project..

From previous Ann:

'The Company maintains that the concerns regarding the validity of the El Campo claims are without
merit. In addition, the granting of the drilling permit for the El Campo project by the BLM provides
strong validation of Locksley’s compliance with all permitting requirements and further reinforces
the robustness of the regulatory framework supporting the Mojave Project. The U.S Mining Law of 1872
and the counterpart California statutes regarding the location and maintenance of unpatented
mining claims occasionally lead to disputes among the owners of unpatented mining claims which
may conflict or overlap on the ground, as is the case of MP Materials’ unfounded assertations
regarding its mining claims. The Company has investigated the location and validity of its mining
claims in the field and in the records of the BLM and the office of the county recorder and has
confirmed the validity of its mining claims and has so informed third parties who claim to own nearby
mining claims. Locksley is advised by leading U.S legal counsel with deep expertise in mining law,
public lands access and federal permitting. The Company remains confident in its legal standing at
the Mojave Project and will defend any claim challenges vigorously, if required.'