chart, page-155

From this GO saga and Firsova's final turn to the beginning I am amazed at the folowing;

a) How little research is conducted by posters before taking positions. GO in particular.

b) How some investors of the (presumed) quality of Firsova can give credit to the likes of GO for matters relating to MHM because GO got some calls correct, and did not check GO track record overall.
Even if a poster gets it correct repeatedly it is not an excuse for not doing your own research.

I often reflect on the usefulness of HC and find it is a formidable tool but needs many checks and balances in its use.

I strongly believe that HC is an issues forum , not a fact forum. Many good facts arise, but their veracity should not be speculated upon until the company has been researched thoroughly.

For Newbies if urge them to pay attention to "facts only" and TA. Also "logical" conclusions "from facts".

MHM is a difficult company to come to understand. I explained recent;ly once to someone who has worked some time in the Al industry as a metalurgist before doing bigger and greater things. First pass on MHM he did not appreciate the magnitude of the potential until he saw the numbers from the research reports. He was ready to buy last I heard.
Independent research reports are very usefull to begin to understand companies with complicated technologies.