a good sign?, page-9

no answer from privacy Last week (18 Feb 2005) I posted this message to Privacy
_____________________________________________
I prefer this. I am not and have not got my head buried in the sand. But when you say keep to the fundamentals that means you posting 20 to 30 inane posts per day basically saying the same thing each time. When you will have a logical rational post based on the fundamentals of LUM then people may actually respect you. Until then people see you for what you are. A cheap opportunist (almost on the same level as David Tweed) who will do anything to make a buck no matter what.
______________________________________________

There has been no response by Privacy. I can only presume that is because he cannot say anything which is logical/rational on the fundamentals of LUM. We are now being once again treated to the same series of posts of no value but all aimed at providing a negative view of LUM. He does this so as to enable him to trade in LUM at the expense of newbies and others who are silly to follow him. I am not sure but the reason for his silence last month was more due to him being banned by Hotcopper for a month. It now seems that Privacy has gained a camp follower in SB2000. I guess idiots attract other idiots.

Once again I do hold shares in LUM