posters some questions & answers of sorts, page-33

Jantimot,

I think that overview was correct in that it explains the assay process and sample preparation.

Lets say that process then returns an intersection of 50m @ 8% copper.

Such an intersection is going to have a nugget effect with NCu. 1m assays could be returning grades of 3%, 4%, 6%, 10%, 12%, 8%, 3% cu etc.

My point is that the jorc process would then use a top cut in grade (maybe 3%), with the smoothing effect designed to take out the nugget effect doing the rest.

Its the interpretation of the assay data the company presented to H&S thats my issue.

I simply now look at it this way.

JORC geological resource = 1.24%
Bulk sample resource = 4.5%