Julia gillard answered in a round about way, that, people would then use their extra money to purchase products from the cheaper, low energy, less polluting co.s (products) ??????
I thought the money was to compensate for the increased costs.
Is she saying that people will have extra money? Is she therefore saying that people will be better off - have more money to spend on the less polluting products?
Plus these are only relatively cheaper because the other goods have been taxed into non-competitiveness.
It's called voodoo economics.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- qanda to bbq julia this evening ...
qanda to bbq julia this evening ..., page-60
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online