Julia gillard answered in a round about way, that, people would then use their extra money to purchase products from the cheaper, low energy, less polluting co.s (products) ??????
I thought the money was to compensate for the increased costs.
Is she saying that people will have extra money? Is she therefore saying that people will be better off - have more money to spend on the less polluting products?
Plus these are only relatively cheaper because the other goods have been taxed into non-competitiveness.
