dow down 250 , page-24

i just re-read the post by annanaum. i originally took it that he was referring to the agreement between sbl and patersons (rather than just the doc sent by patersons to their clients).

i think that its really the agreement between sbl and patersons that needs scrutiny but i think we've got buckleys to get a look at that!

k


i restate to all sbl holders:

"rather than issue a cap raising at 2.5c wouldn't it be better to piss patersons off completely and offer a rights issue to shareholders for the same $$$ value?

k"