pop growth still running at 350,000 pa, page-8

now don't be facetious but we all know that population growth of say 2% represents a greater and greater number every year.

I don't believe population is linear nor exponential but even 300,000 population growth per year places strain on resources be it infrastructure or housing stock.

I just want a little balance in this forum, some of you have been arguing for years that Armageddon is always around the corner. I don't see the conditions for that to happen at the moment. Stagnation or mild decline in some areas, perhaps. Some markets will decline more so, but some may appreciate. Inner city looks pretty healthy to me.